10 Grammar Mistakes Professionals Still Make in 2025 (Fixed by AI Keyboards)

The Professional Writing Crisis Nobody Talks About

I've reviewed thousands of professional emails in my career, and here's something that still surprises me: even senior executives send messages with basic grammar errors. Last week, a VP at a Fortune 500 company sent me an email that confused "your" and "you're" three times. It wasn't because they didn't know the difference—they were typing fast on their phone between meetings.

Grammar mistakes don't mean someone's unintelligent. They mean we're all human, typing faster than ever, switching between devices, and juggling multiple conversations. The problem is that one misplaced apostrophe can make a $50,000 proposal look unprofessional.

That's where AI keyboards changed everything. These tools catch errors before you hit send, and they do it without making you feel stupid or slowing you down.

Your vs. You're: The Most Common Professional Mistake

This one's embarrassing because everyone knows the rule. "Your" shows possession. "You're" means "you are." Yet it shows up wrong in professional emails constantly.

Why does this happen? Because when you're typing quickly, your brain processes the sound, not the spelling. You think "your going to love this proposal" and your fingers type what your brain hears.

Traditional autocorrect can't fix this because both words are spelled correctly. But AI writing keyboards understand context. They know that "your going" doesn't make grammatical sense, while "you're going" does.

I tested this with five different grammar keyboard apps. All of them caught the error instantly and suggested the correction before I finished the sentence. The best ones even explained why the correction was needed, which helps you learn over time.

The fix isn't about memorizing rules you already know—it's about catching mistakes when you're moving fast. That's what AI keyboards do best.

Its vs. It's: When Apostrophes Attack

Here's where English gets weird. We use apostrophes for possession (Sarah's laptop), but not for "its." Meanwhile, "it's" always means "it is" or "it has." This breaks the normal pattern, which is why professionals mess it up constantly.

I've seen this error in:

• Client presentations
• Internal memos from C-suite executives
• Marketing materials that went through three rounds of edits

The mistake happens because we're applying a rule that works 99% of the time. Our brains see "the company and its products" and think "wait, shouldn't that be it's?"

AI keyboards for business solve this by checking every instance. They don't just look at spelling—they analyze whether you meant possession or contraction. When you type "its been a great quarter," the AI knows you meant "it's" because "been" requires a verb.

What's impressive is how these tools learn your writing patterns. If you frequently use "its" correctly in technical writing, the AI becomes more confident in your usage and only flags actual errors. This reduces false positives and makes the corrections more helpful.

According to a Grammarly study, this apostrophe confusion ranks in the top three grammar errors across all professional writing. But it's also one of the easiest for AI to fix because the context is usually clear.

Subject-Verb Agreement: When Complexity Creates Chaos

"The team are working on the project" or "The team is working on the project"? Both sound right depending on where you're from, but only one follows standard American English grammar.

Subject-verb agreement gets tricky when:

• Collective nouns act as single units
• Phrases separate the subject from the verb
• Multiple subjects connect with "or" or "nor"

I write a lot, and I still pause on sentences like "Neither the manager nor the employees was/were informed." The rule says to match the verb to the closest subject (employees = were), but that's not intuitive when you're drafting a quick email.

AI keyboards handle this automatically. They parse the sentence structure and match subjects with verbs based on number and person. When you type "The list of requirements are complete," the AI recognizes that "list" (singular) is the subject, not "requirements" (plural), and suggests "is complete" instead.

This matters more than you might think. A Harvard Business Review article found that grammar mistakes in professional communication can reduce perceived credibility by up to 40%. Subject-verb disagreement specifically signals carelessness to readers.

The best part about using an AI writing keyboard for this is that it works in real-time. You don't need to finish the sentence and then review it—the correction appears as you type, so you can adjust immediately.

Comma Splices: The Run-On Sentence Nobody Notices

A comma splice happens when you join two complete sentences with just a comma. Like this: "The meeting ran late, we missed the deadline." Both parts could stand alone as sentences, so the comma isn't strong enough to connect them.

This error is everywhere in professional writing because it matches how we speak. When you're explaining something verbally, you naturally pause where commas go. But written English has stricter rules.

The fix requires either:

• A semicolon: "The meeting ran late; we missed the deadline."
• A conjunction: "The meeting ran late, so we missed the deadline."
• A period: "The meeting ran late. We missed the deadline."

I've used AI keyboards for email writing for two years now, and they catch every comma splice I create. The AI doesn't just flag the error—it suggests the best fix based on the tone and context of your message.

For formal emails, it might suggest a semicolon. For casual messages, it might recommend splitting into two sentences. This context awareness makes the corrections feel natural rather than robotic.

What surprised me most was how much clearer my writing became once I stopped creating comma splices. Readers don't consciously notice the error, but they do experience the confusion it creates. Fixing these mistakes makes your ideas easier to follow.

Misplaced Apostrophes: The Plural Catastrophe

"The CEO's are meeting today" is wrong. "The CEOs are meeting today" is correct. Yet this mistake appears in professional documents all the time.

The rule is simple: apostrophes show possession or contraction, not plurality. But when you're typing quickly, especially on mobile, your brain sees a word ending in a vowel and thinks "this needs something" before the 's'.

Common apostrophe disasters include:

• "1990's" instead of "1990s"
• "menu's" instead of "menus"
• "photo's" instead of "photos"

AI grammar keyboards eliminate this problem by checking every apostrophe against grammar rules. They know that decades don't need apostrophes, that regular plurals don't either, and that possessive forms do.

I tested this by intentionally typing "The report's are ready" in three different AI keyboard apps. All three caught it immediately and changed "report's" to "reports." One even showed me a quick explanation: "Apostrophes indicate possession or contraction, not plurality."

This matters because misplaced apostrophes look unprofessional. They signal that you either don't know the rule or didn't bother to check your work. Neither impression helps your career.

Their, There, They're: The Triple Threat

These three words sound identical but mean completely different things. "Their" shows possession. "There" indicates location. "They're" means "they are."

Despite knowing these definitions, professionals mix them up constantly. I've done it myself in texts to clients, usually when I'm typing one-handed while carrying coffee.

The confusion happens because:

• All three words are common
• They sound exactly the same
• Autocorrect doesn't catch the error (all three are spelled correctly)
• Your brain focuses on meaning, not spelling

AI keyboards solve this by analyzing context. When you type "their going to the office," the AI recognizes that "going" requires a verb, so "their" can't be correct. It suggests "they're" instead.

What makes modern AI keyboards better than older grammar checkers is speed. The correction appears instantly, usually before you've finished typing the word. This makes the fix feel natural rather than disruptive.

I've also noticed that using an AI writing keyboard has actually reduced how often I make this mistake. Seeing the correct usage reinforced repeatedly helps retrain your typing habits.

Effect vs. Affect: The Professional Writer's Nemesis

"Effect" is usually a noun (the result). "Affect" is usually a verb (to influence). But English being English, there are exceptions that confuse everyone.

I've been writing professionally for over a decade, and I still pause on sentences like "This will effect/affect our quarterly results." The verb is "affect," but my brain hesitates because "effect" appears more often in business writing.

The distinction matters:

• "The policy will affect sales" (verb—it will influence sales)
• "The policy will have an effect on sales" (noun—it will create a result)

AI keyboards for professionals handle this by checking the sentence structure. If you type "This will effect change," most AI keyboards will accept it because "effect" can be a verb meaning "to bring about." But if you type "This will effect our budget," the AI knows you meant "affect" because budgets are influenced, not brought about.

The advanced AI models even consider industry-specific usage. In psychology, "affect" as a noun (referring to emotion) is common. In business writing, it's almost always a verb. The keyboard adapts to your writing context.

This level of sophistication wasn't possible five years ago. Now it's standard in most professional AI keyboards.

Who vs. Whom: The Formal Grammar Rule Nobody Remembers

Technically, "who" is a subject and "whom" is an object. Practically, most people just use "who" for everything and hope for the best.

The traditional test is to substitute "he/him" and see which sounds right. If "him" works, use "whom." If "he" works, use "who."

For example:

• "Who/whom should I contact?" → "Should I contact him?" → Use "whom"
• "Who/whom is calling?" → "He is calling" → Use "who"

But let's be honest—nobody does this test while typing a quick email. And in casual business communication, using "who" for everything is increasingly accepted.

AI keyboards handle this by considering formality. For casual messages, they might accept "who" in all cases. For formal documents, they'll suggest "whom" where appropriate.

I've found this particularly useful when writing to executives or external stakeholders. The AI recognizes the formality level from the recipient and message content, then adjusts its suggestions accordingly.

The result is that your writing matches the situation without you needing to remember obscure grammar rules from high school.

Incomplete Comparisons: The Missing Link

"Our product is better" is an incomplete comparison. Better than what? This mistake appears constantly in marketing copy, sales emails, and product descriptions.

Incomplete comparisons happen when you're excited about what you're saying and assume the reader knows the context. But they don't always.

Examples of incomplete comparisons:

• "We offer faster service" (faster than whom?)
• "This solution is more affordable" (more affordable than what?)
• "Our team is more experienced" (more experienced than which team?)

AI writing keyboards catch these by checking for comparison words ("better," "faster," "more") without clear reference points. When you type "Our approach is more effective," the AI might prompt: "More effective than what? Consider adding a comparison."

This feature has improved my sales writing significantly. Instead of vague claims, I now write specific comparisons: "Our approach is more effective than traditional methods" or "Our approach is 40% more effective based on client results."

The specificity makes your writing more credible and persuasive. Readers trust concrete comparisons more than vague superiority claims.

Double Negatives: When Casual Speech Creeps In

"I didn't do nothing" means you did something, but that's not what most people mean when they say it. Double negatives create confusion in professional writing, even though they're common in casual speech.

Professional double negatives are usually more subtle:

• "We can't deny that there aren't problems" (confusing)
• "We can't deny that there are problems" (clear)

The issue isn't that readers can't figure out what you meant—it's that they have to pause and parse the sentence. That pause breaks the flow of your message and reduces its impact.

AI keyboards detect double negatives by analyzing sentence structure. When you type "We don't have no concerns," the AI flags it and suggests "We don't have any concerns" or "We have no concerns."

What I appreciate about modern AI keyboards is that they don't just remove the error—they suggest the clearest alternative. Sometimes that means keeping one negative and removing the other. Sometimes it means restructuring the entire sentence for better clarity.

This goes beyond grammar correction into actual writing improvement. You end up with clearer, more direct communication that readers understand immediately.

Frequently Asked Questions